An Experiential Case Study of Leadership Issues Within
The Organization
Mr. Valerian B-K. Masao II
Management-Leadership
Introduction
to the Organization and Its Leadership
This student is working for a
Not-For-Profit (NFP) organization that was established in 1833 providing a caring culture
to support needy women and children through a foundling asylum program. The NFP
organization’s initial programs have changed over the duration of time, but the
needs of the clients, communities and families are still the same; i.e. to feel
dignified, to receive comfort, to obtain guidance that mature, flourish quality
and include productive human values.
The mission of the NFP organization is to empower children, adults and families
to build brighter futures; whereas its values are within its team of employees
who are loyal
and represent pride respect, optimism, accountability, leadership and
service to others. The NFP organization leadership aim is to have a vibrant and
learning organizational culture. For example, Fagiano (1994), talked about requirements for creating
successful corporate culture change that is not only part of statements or
philosophies; but rather from leadership and management collectively to consistently
back up what they say with their actions strengthening the “change” attitudes
at all levels and on the daily activities.
The NFP’s organizational
goal is to empower
youth who are developmentally disabled individuals and families to build
perkier futures, and to endure with such valuable commitment in sustaining the
lasting service and care to the communities the organizations serves.
Certainly, leaders of the organization must have an ambitious purpose to
influence people’s lives and must have good moral guiding values and principles
(Kouzes & Posner, 2007).
At this NFP organization leadership is
to be ethical, competent, have good character and moral values because leaders
are responsible for culture change, which is the reflection on how things are
done in the organization/society (Brown, 2011). Since its establishment, over
175 years ago, the NFP
organization leadership team has been able to take charge by acting and
influencing others to follow their directives toward common goals, objectives,
and purposes.
According
to Kouzes & Posner (2007), leadership is when someone assumes
responsibility of him/herself inspiring others to accomplish common goals and
extraordinary tasks. Thus, the NFP organization has had exemplary leaders who
have strong beliefs about leadership values, which guide them as principles
with unwavering commitments to this organization’s values, something that they
managed to keep alive for over 175 years of service (Kouzes & Posner,
2007). Its leadership model and current model, is leading-by-example with
personal accountability because the NFP organization’s employees, clients and
families, government authorities, and surrounding communities depends heavily
on the leadership to provide quality care and services.
The
current NFP organization leader understands that successful leadership in this
era is through shared visions and requires everyone to take leadership at
his/her station and level. It means that anyone with the capacity of mobilizing
and influence decisions that enable him/herself or others to act, inspire a
shared vision, model the way, challenge the process and encourage the heart to
bear the leadership responsibilities of him/herself, others and or an
organization. Therefore, in this globalized world organizational change is
inevitable and exemplary leadership practices that are inventive, supportive
and comprehensive are compulsory for the leaders to manage the constant
organizational change (Bennis, 1999).
The
NFP Organization Leadership and Professionals Ethical Dilemmas
An experiential
case study of leadership that this student has seen in his current organization
is the ethical dilemma that leadership runs into every time when certified and
licensed professionals have practiced their professional tasks yet at the same
time align their values to those of organizational values. Any NFP organization
leader must well align his/her values with the
organization’s values because it will more likely prevent ethical dilemmas and
clashes that can cause conflicting interests. The alignment of values and
ethical standing points are the grand values within the NFP organization and it
is sentimental for the NFP organization leader to have them because leaders must
have a resilient basis of peculiar ethics, values and principles (Graber &
Kilpatrick, 2008).
The NFP organization
leadership orders the NFP management to manage care and services at the
required levels both efficiently and effectively. Whereby the licensed and
certified professionals go to the next level of ethical guidelines that require
them to make sure they don’t do any harm and to serve the best interest of the
clients/patients/individuals. These values tend to clash with the leadership
values, through management, because the licensed and certified professionals
are not meant to solemnly manage efficiency and effectiveness, if to do so will
do harm or not serve the best interests of the clients/patients/individuals.
At the setting
of the NFP organization the order from leadership can be ethical or unethical
depending on the circumstances; such as who is executing such decisions, when
and at what capacity. Given the cumbersome nature of implementation of such
leadership order and back and forth clarification that is needed between the
professionals, management and leadership, the level of care and services the
NFP organization offers become imbedded with dilemmas. The ethical dilemma that
leadership is facing involves executing its leadership and management decisions
when it comes to the general welfare of its clients/patients/individuals and
when licensed and certified professionals are involved. Therefore, leadership
assessments should be an ongoing practice that can function as a continuous
process that evaluate and mediate the outcomes for further regenerative assessment,
knowledge base, and preparation for what the future may bring (Kouzes &
Posner, 2007).
During
the 2008 economic meltdown, as the NFP organization was recovering, the
management staged itself perceiving that it was always right, knew everything
and was above these professions on everything; in result, some members of
management entered the stage of denial, especially when there was a conflict
between ethics, values and the code of conduct of these licensed and certified
professional workers (Benzel,
2008).
Several times it ended up backfiring management by having full blown
investigations by local and state governments through its governing agencies. It was then that leadership understood the
ethical dilemmas that were problematic, so they aligned their values with those
of the certified and licensed professionals followed by management. The ethical
dilemma that caused the investigations never became a problem since then.
The
NFP organization’s licensed and certified professionals are confronted with
values and ethical dilemmas when confronted by conflicting values such as when
leadership or management interferes with their professional codes of conduct or
their decision making process’ simply because they are not profitable or they
are not aligned with leadership values. Often managers who initially did not do
work as the above professions tend to overstep and overlook the input and
values of these professional workers. For example, Saban &
Wolfe (2009), researched schools across the America and they found that
principals are facing an unnerving leadership duty and for them to become
successful they need all kinds of support including the local, state and
federal government leadership support.
Another value and ethical dilemma that NFP organization leadership
got caught up with is the benefit and compensation adjustments that the
organization had to make during the 2008 economic meltdown that eroded the
NFP’s investments and those of its employees. Some professional employees left
the NFP organization all together and some had to recheck their values and realign
them with the newly adopted organization values. For the NFP organization management
to retain such a functional number of professionals without operational
set-back, sets a powerful testimony that leadership’s ability to establish a
process of sharing aligned personal and organizational values can become the roadmap to sustainable, creative, and dynamic
dealings among employees at the work place and during difficult times (Kouzes and Posner, 2007).
The
value and ethical dilemma is when leadership decided to cut benefits and
compensation of its professionals during the tough times and when the NFP organization
lost its employees’ investments through the Wall Street gamble. It sent a
signal to many professionals/employees that no matter how long they have
committed their services to the NFP organization, leadership was not
considerate, especially during the time of their need to lien on NFP
organization for financial, employment, healthcare and sense of confidence that
the NFP organization got its employees’ back. For example, a
research found that organizational values as a more important prognosticator of
job satisfaction than personal values; for instance if organizations stress on
justice it may personally satisfy employees, and when they stress on harmony it
extrinsically satisfied employees; thus, an organization has to focus on
combined factors in order to gratify and encourage employees to become more effective
producers (Kumar,
2012). This sounds like a balanced approach that
advocates for good leadership values and ethics.
The
Exemplary Leadership Values
Through
its mission, vision, values and goals the NFP organization founders and leaders
were able to foresee the future by predicting the opportunities it brings and
understand that the care and services it provides are noble, ideal and unique
images of the shared vision for the mutual benefit of the individuals, their
families and the communities (Kouzes & Posner, 2007). The NFP organization
has had exemplary leaders that benefited both the organization and communities
it serves. This is consistent with the research findings by Kouzes & Posner
(2007), furthered that leadership has five exemplary leadership practices,
which are common amongst all leaders i.e. enable others to act, inspire a
shared vision, model the way, challenge the process and encourage the heart.
When it comes to ethical dilemmas
like above examples, the NFP organization leadership need to resolve the
conflicts by using what this student uses, the open door policy, which allows
him to coordinate multi services and care the NFP organization provide by have
a long and short term strategies in the biweekly treatment team meetings.
Working with professionals and employees is the winning strategy because there
are sets of rules, values, ethics moral characters and expectations enticed in
these professionals. According to Benzel (2008), leaders
have a number of ways to establish
and maintain credibility i.e. by stating conclusions cautiously, learning from others
without rush to judgment, honoring
others with respect and dignity, acknowledging when not knowing the solutions,
and expressing regret for errors on pitiable decisions.
NFP
organization leaders need to have exemplary leadership values aligning their
values to the NFP organization and learn quickly adjusting from common errors
that can create ethical dilemmas. An exemplary leader here will need to
modernize the NFP organization’s short-term and long-term viewpoints by asking
and answering questions that accentuate on the employees growth and their
motivated convictions that contest the status quo; whereby managers administer
leadership’s directions by probing, emphasizing on the system, upholding and
assuring control that implements short-term leadership viewpoints (Reynolds
& Warfield, 2010).
At this NFP organization, leadership
states conclusions cautiously, learning from others without rush to judgment, honoring others with respect and dignity,
recognizing when not knowing the solutions, but striving to get one, expressing
regret for errors on pitiable decisions, thriving to optimize a brighter
future, and learning from the past mistakes (Benzel, 2008).
This is an evolving and regenerative leadership process. Thus, employees,
members and management are subjected to answer to the leadership’s directions.
The
NFP organization understands well that leadership assessments are processes
used to improve and empower a leader’s ability to lead with confidence and
self-assurance in an unstable, ambiguous, complex and during crisis situations.
Therefore, leaders must be experienced and knowledgeable to formulate
organizational culture, because this position is the powerful driving force
that creates organizational culture change through strategic leadership (Fitz-Enz,
1997). It’s about the leader’s performance to create the environment and
culture of employees to welcome change and challenge by combining their effort
to attain common goals; also successful leaders transform the employees and the
organization’s “values into actions, visions into realities, obstacles into
innovations, separateness into solidarity, and risks into rewards” (Kouzes
& Posner, 2012, p. 3-4).
It is necessary for the exemplary leaders to manage the image of
the organization and also to stir the direction of the organization toward the
path of growth and prosperity. Therefore, it is imperative for leaders to follow
the laws and adhere to society manners and ethics that help them to mediate
between their association and moral identity to avoid conflicts of unethical
behavior and bad relationships (Mayer, Aquino, Greenbaum, & Kuenzi, 2012).
In this case study the NFP organization’s leadership is the proven evolving
factor that demonstrates magnifying positions that need improvement, especially
when dilemmas arise and lessons are learned. Exemplary leaders need to have shared visions and
to learn quickly, while aligning their values in this constant changing
environment and reflect to the contemporary change.
Conclusion
According to Kouzes and Posner
(2007), “Leadership is everyone’s business.
No matter what your position is, you have to take responsibility for the
quality of leadership your constituents get.
You – and that means all of us – are accountable for the leadership you
demonstrate” (p.339). Therefore, successful
and exemplary leader is someone who is able to empower everyone as a team to
take personal pride and responsibility of personal leadership that makes
extraordinary things to happen. Consequently, distrusted employees and or
distrusting leaders put the entire organization at risk of becoming unproductive. This sums up the importance of
what Groysberg
& Slind (2012), articulated leadership as the ability to physically,
mentally and emotional communicate values and goals to the employees without
distortion.
What
this student finding attests in this experiential
case study of leadership issues, while working with the NFP organization, is
that values and ethical dilemmas caused between the leadership and licensed and
or certified professionals were because of power struggles among the involved
parties. Often values and ethical dilemmas happen when parties did not take
leadership and or responsibilities. When incidents
like these happen leadership’s credibility becomes untrustworthy and it puts a
negative environment for the entire organization through the leadership and
management that is responsible for working with these professionals to achieve
the organizational goals. Thus, it is imperative for leadership to
understand its traits, visions, values, mission and goals because together
these make up a theory that clarifies leadership efficiency and effectiveness
by its natural features and abilities to connect the dots, others to align with
the vision and support the employees/members to apply the mission and attain
the organizational strategic goals (Oyinlade, 2006). It is also equally important for all to
know that leadership is taking personal responsibilities and responsibilities
of others through sharing visions and values at all levels by everyone to do his or her part accordingly.
Reference
Bennis, W.
(1999). The end of leadership: Exemplary leadership is impossible without full
inclusion, initiatives, and cooperation of followers. Organizational
dynamics, 28(1), 71-79.
Benzel, D.
(2008). Establish your credibility. Credit union management, 31(1),
13. Link:
Brown, D. (2011). An
experiential approach to organization development, 8th Ed. Upper
saddle river, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fagiano, D. (1994). Altering the corporate DNA. Management
review, 83(12), 4.
Fitz-Enz, J.
(1997). The 8 practices of exceptional
companies: How great organizations make the most of their human assets. New
York, AMACOM.
Graber, D. R.,
& Kilpatrick, A. (2008). Establishing value-based leadership and value
systems in healthcare organizations. Journal of health & human services
administration, 31(2), 179-197.
Groysberg, B.,
& Slind, M. (2012). Leadership is a conversation. Harvard business
review, 90(6), 76-84.
Kouzes, J.M.
& Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and
Sons.
Kumar, N.
(2012). Relationship of personal and organizational values with job
satisfaction. Journal of management research (09725814), 12(2),
75-82.
Levasseur, R. E.
(2011). People skills: Optimizing team development and performance. Interfaces,
41(2), 204-208. doi:10.1287/inte.1100.0519
Mayer, D. M.,
Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical
leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and
consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of management journal, 55(1),
151-171. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.0276.
Oyinlade, A.
(2006). A method of assessing leadership effectiveness introducing the
essential behavioral leadership qualities approach. Performance improvement
quarterly, 19(1), 25-40.
Reynolds, J.,
& Warfield, W. H. (2010). Discerning the differences between managers and
leaders. Education digest, 75(7), 61-64.
Saban, J., &
Wolfe, S. (2009). Mentoring principals around leadership practices. Catalyst
for change, 36(1), 2-6.
The Fatherhood Life Reader(s) Signature and Disclaimer. Content of this Blog (The Fatherhood Life) is intended for reading use only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. Reader(s) discretion is required of essence. If you have received this link in error, please close the window and inform us promptly by profile e-mail and or comment line. Content of this blog are protected under the privacy, 1st amendment and private property laws. Do not distribute, print, download and or copy content of this Blog without Blog Administrator’s permission or proper academic references to Fatherhood Life Blog. Also contents of this Blog are personal opinion, views, perception and private or Public observations of the Blogger(s). Thank you and may God bless you and The United States Of America. "In God we Trust" and "United We Stand".
2 comments:
Assistant superintendent Dr Scott Patrick added: "If you give them the right options they are able to eat, they'll make a choice in the two or three options. The rapid growth in IC design industry leads for the continuously expanded interest in domestic chip OEM. A new challenge is discovered immediately: because of the size from the castings, they might need to be kept in the mould for 72 hours after pouring.
Thanks for sharing such a good idea, piece of writing is good, thats why i have read it
completely
Post a Comment